kashif_ash
...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 28, 6:28 am, jim beam <spamvor
...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> kashif_ash
...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> Dear group members,
>>> i have encountered one problem and need to analyzed it before taking
>>> any preventive action.
>>> Contorl cable (1/8", 7X19, steel cable) strands wires were found
>>> broken in the area where it run overs pulleys (phenolic). I have came
>>> to know that these area are critical to fatigue but couldnt figured
>>> out the reason and mechanism which led to such damage near pulleys. if
>>> some one can explain me the propbable causes / reason which can led to
>>> such occurrences or reasons which can aggravate the situation, so that
>>> i can based my maintenance procedures and frequency to avoid future
>>> recurrence.
>>> hope for a sound engineering / scientific reply from group members.
>>> thanks
>> simple bending fatigue. try a larger radius on the pulley. if that's
>> not possible, better material/surface finish quality on the cable
>> [strands] might help.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> well i have checked pulleys as well, in some pulleys i have observed
> cable groove marks in the pulley. however, i have tested the cable
> sample with broken wire strands and their breaking strenght was
> passing the ASTM standard with the exception of one sample that failed
> to qualify the tests.
breaking strength is not fatigue strength - fatigue is your problem.
angle is not radius. radius defines bending stress. see point above.