Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
mrdarr...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options Jul 3, 6:25 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: mrdarr...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 6:25 pm
Subject: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As
I built an astable multivibrator with blinking lights (much simpler
than using a 556!), as a test for a circuit that will use a power
transistor (or MOSFET) to pulse a transformer primary for future
experiments.

http://mrdarrett.googlepages.com/blinkenlights002.pdf

Strangely, when I replaced the two 2N3904 transistors with TIP31As,
the circuit would not oscillate unless I briefly disconnected then re-
connected R2 or R3.  (I bumped the voltage up from 3V to 6V during
these tests.)

As a work-around, I'm considering just putting the 2N3904s back in,
and connecting the positive end of C2 to the base of a TIP31A.
Inelegant, but I think it will work.

I'm trying to figure out why TIP31As won't work, but it also doesn't
help me any that the TIP31A data sheet does not specify a minimum
V_BE_on.

http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/ds/12292/tip31a.pdf

Input?

Michael


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob Eld  
View profile
 More options Jul 3, 9:54 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Bob Eld" <nsmontas...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:54:27 -0700
Local: Thurs, Jul 3 2008 9:54 pm
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As

<mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:7edf1122-2064-4799-9661-4828c556a5ce@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

One possible reason it doesn't work with certain transistors is that the two
transistors come on together and lock up the operation. It fails to
flip-flop.  Also, there might not be enough base current for TIP31's with R2
and R3 at 10K. Lower these resistors. The minimum beta is 25 at 1 amp. so
you're likely not getting enough current to drive these transistors.

To insure that an astable won't lock up, disconnect R2 and R3 from the
positive rail and connect the junction of the two resistors to the cathodes
of two diodes. Connect the anodes of the diodes to the anodes of the LED's,
one on each.

With this arrangement,  if the transistors both come on together, the base
drive is reduced and the circuit will always start.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mrdarr...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 1:54 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: mrdarr...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 22:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 1:54 am
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As
On Jul 3, 6:54 pm, "Bob Eld" <nsmontas...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Thanks!

Michael


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Paul E. Schoen  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 2:45 am
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Paul E. Schoen" <pst...@smart.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 02:45:49 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 2:45 am
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As

<mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:a731e6f8-d541-4301-9959-88d1f7d9106b@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

I tried simulating various forms of this circuit with both 2N3904 and
2N3055, and it always seemed to work, at least down to 2.5 volts or so. It
seemed to woek better if I connected C1 and C2 directly to the collectors,
which have a bit more voltage swing. I would suggest connecting a logic
level MOSFET to drive a transformer, so you will have minimal loading.
Without the LEDs, you will have plenty of voltage swing for the gate. And
you can use an N-channel to sink a higher voltage on a transformer CT, or
P-channel to source the voltage. You might even be able to make a full
bridge, but you need to make sure there is dead time where both the
high-side and low side are off. This is why they have dedicated circuits
for that.

Paul


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mrdarr...@gmail.com  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 1:02 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: mrdarr...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As
On Jul 3, 11:45 pm, "Paul E. Schoen" <pst...@smart.net> wrote:

Yep, that's why I thought pulsed DC would be easier.

Michael


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob Monsen  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 2:32 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Bob Monsen" <rcmon...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:32:07 -0700
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As
<mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:7edf1122-2064-4799-9661-4828c556a5ce@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

One of the nice things about 555s and 556s is that they always start if you
keep within the specifications in the data sheet. The main issue folks have
is that they forget to bypass the power supply, which often causes
retriggering problems.

If you have a cmos 555 laying about, you can do this in a way that is pretty
much guaranteed to start.

As a side note, the easy way to build a square wave oscillator from a cmos
555 is to connect the output pin to a resistor, then connect the other side
of the resistor to ground through a capacitor. Now, connect both the trigger
and threshold inputs to the junction of the resistor and capacitor.

Using this configuration, you can also use the discharge pin as an 'open
collector' output, and use it to drive arbitrary bits of circuitry. For your
application, you might use the discharge to directly drive one LED, and have
the other LED driven by a power PMOS or PNP transistor.

If the resistor you use is a pot, you can then adjust the frequency without
affecting the duty cycle by varying the resistance. You can work out the
limits of the frequencies you can obtain, given your parts.

Note that the TTL outputs of NE555 variants don't easily lend themselves to
this approach, due to the asymmetric current draw of the output for high and
low output signals. CMOS versions offer nice rail-to-rail square wave
output.

This is a nice way to do it, which I learned here from a post by John Fields
a couple of years ago. (Yet another example of what a nice resource this
group is). I'm not sure if it was his idea, or if he learned it from
somebody else. I haven't seen this idea in any of the data sheets I've
looked at.

Regards,
 Bob Monsen


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Paul E. Schoen  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 3:20 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: "Paul E. Schoen" <pst...@smart.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:20:40 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As

<mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:832a69e0-dafd-41e3-aae9-56eb27d658d2@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

But, also remember that you must have very little DC current in any
transformer winding, or you will get saturation. Pulsed DC can be used if
you are building a circuit where you are alternately storing and releasing
energy in the magnetic field, in which case you really have an inductor,
which may have additional windings for various reasons (especially
isolation, multiple outputs, and large differences in input to output
voltage/current).

You might have a look at the Microchip PIC16F616, which has multiple
on-board PWM outputs that can be programmed to drive various power supply
circuits ranging from simple single inductor buck or boost converters, to
center tapped transformers, and full bridge circuits (using MOSFETs, of
course). I'm using that PIC (and its similar cousin, PIC16F684) to make a
single inductor 100 kHz boost converter from 12 VDC to anything from 20 to
60 VDC at close to 1 amp, and it would only take a few changes in the power
components (MOSFET, inductor, Schottky diode, and capacitors) to scale that
up to several hundred watts. And some simple additional diodes and
capacitors can also provide a negative output that tracks the positive
output for balanced loads. I have posted the LTSpice file before. If you
want to learn PIC programming this might be a fun project.

Paul


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Black  
View profile
 More options Jul 4, 3:29 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.basics
From: Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:29:09 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 4 2008 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: astable multivibrator issues - 2N3904s work, but not TIP31As

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Bob Monsen wrote:
> This is a nice way to do it, which I learned here from a post by John Fields
> a couple of years ago. (Yet another example of what a nice resource this
> group is). I'm not sure if it was his idea, or if he learned it from somebody
> else. I haven't seen this idea in any of the data sheets I've looked at.

If you're talking about the resistor from the output to pins 6 & 2, that
was in "Electronics" over thirty years ago, albeit with a pullup resistor
on the output since it was the original 555 at the time.  It was either
in "Designer's Notebook" or "Engineer's Casebook", I guess the former
is most likely.

It's included in Walter Jung's "IC Timer Cookbook" (which is a lot
easier to dig out than the original article) and credits it to the
June 21, 1973 issue of "Electronics".  It does not bother with
the pull-up resistor, though it then suggests it as an improved
version of the simple circuit.

When I saw it, I thought it was great, no fussing with two timing
resistors, and no worry that the pulse width would get too narrow
over a wide range.  So any time I need a non-specific clock, I use
the circuit, without the pullup reisstor.  It works fine, it gives
far less variation in output pulse width than the standard circuit
with the two timing resistors, that require you to fuss with the
resistors to keep the pulse width reasonably constant.

For a lot of breadboarding, and even finished circuits, "close
enough" is good enough, so you don't need the pullup resistor
on the output, or a CMOS 555.

    Michael


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google