<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.lang.javascript Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript</link>
  <description>Netscape Communications Corp.&amp;#39;s JavaScript language.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/5d80c5ee3d6c2bf0?show_docid=5d80c5ee3d6c2bf0</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Some authors said (and this was where I got confused) that the &lt;br&gt; closure has access to the variables of the outer function. This is &lt;br&gt; sort of true. Really it has access to the variable&#39;s names and values &lt;br&gt; at the moment the closure is created.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; This isn&#39;t clear enough... a bit messy. &lt;br&gt; An inner function that survives keeps working **exactly*as*it*did**
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/5d80c5ee3d6c2bf0?show_docid=5d80c5ee3d6c2bf0</guid>
  <author>
  jo...@jorgechamorro.com
  (Jorge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:32:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/143f33731f0d8e85?show_docid=143f33731f0d8e85</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;The execution context contains names and values of, among others, &lt;br&gt; variables, parameters and inner functions. When outer() returns a &lt;br&gt; function it also returns its execution context at the time of the &lt;br&gt; return.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; The idea is something like: &lt;br&gt; 0.- Upon entering a function, a new execution context is created for
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/143f33731f0d8e85?show_docid=143f33731f0d8e85</guid>
  <author>
  jo...@jorgechamorro.com
  (Jorge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:21:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Overriding .textContent of BR elements</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/4e8db5f11e0f5340/7ed3c2eb5008b589?show_docid=7ed3c2eb5008b589</link>
  <description>
  FF 1.5 really shouldn&#39;t be used anymore, except for compatibility &lt;br&gt; testing. I would understand version 2.x (some people can&#39;t run 3.x &lt;br&gt; because of missing libraries), but 1.5 is ancient. &lt;br&gt; After reading that bug report, and the specs, it looks like that&#39;s the &lt;br&gt; correct and expected behavior. Inconvenient, maybe, but at least it&#39;s
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/4e8db5f11e0f5340/7ed3c2eb5008b589?show_docid=7ed3c2eb5008b589</guid>
  <author>
  crlen...@yahoo.com
  (Conrad Lender)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:19:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/68f53369f9abf61d?show_docid=68f53369f9abf61d</link>
  <description>
  Declare an outer function, including any necessary parameters and &lt;br&gt; data. Declare an inner function. Have the outer function return the &lt;br&gt; inner function. &lt;br&gt; function outer([params]) { &lt;br&gt; // vars declared here &lt;br&gt; var closure = function([params]) { /* code here */ } &lt;br&gt; return closure; &lt;br&gt; }
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/68f53369f9abf61d?show_docid=68f53369f9abf61d</guid>
  <author>
  jo...@jorgechamorro.com
  (Jorge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:04:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/521f1151957cd87c?show_docid=521f1151957cd87c</link>
  <description>
  Where does he say that? &lt;br&gt; You&#39;re quoting him out of context; JSON wouldn&#39;t be possible if nested &lt;br&gt; curlies weren&#39;t allowed. Just a guess, but he was probably talking about &lt;br&gt; the absence of (traditional*) block scope in JavaScript, and was &lt;br&gt; suggesting that unnecessary {} blocks shouldn&#39;t be used, in order to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/521f1151957cd87c?show_docid=521f1151957cd87c</guid>
  <author>
  crlen...@yahoo.com
  (Conrad Lender)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:58:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/3f3eb7153db8f71c?show_docid=3f3eb7153db8f71c</link>
  <description>
  On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 at 02:38:08, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Moreover, the language Crockford defines isn&#39;t JavaScript, or even &lt;br&gt; javascript. It&#39;s a language where you aren&#39;t allowed to do &lt;br&gt; ... { ... { ... } ... } ... &lt;br&gt; but if you want to pervert Crockford&#39;s prejudices you are allowed to do
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/3f3eb7153db8f71c?show_docid=3f3eb7153db8f71c</guid>
  <author>
  j...@nospam.demon.co.uk
  (John G Harris)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:31:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: FAQ Sections - Feedback Wanted</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/0c95c367868f128d?show_docid=0c95c367868f128d</link>
  <description>
  Yes.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/0c95c367868f128d?show_docid=0c95c367868f128d</guid>
  <author>
  dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
  (dhtml)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:38:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: FAQ Sections - Feedback Wanted</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/0b277098aef6eb97?show_docid=0b277098aef6eb97</link>
  <description>
  Are you maintaining the FAQ now? &lt;br&gt; Peter
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/0b277098aef6eb97?show_docid=0b277098aef6eb97</guid>
  <author>
  petermich...@gmail.com
  (Peter Michaux)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:50:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: script wanted not standard tab menu thing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/8051e551e2748d5d/a641e397400d9445?show_docid=a641e397400d9445</link>
  <description>
  The trouble with you (well one of the troubles so far) is that you are &lt;br&gt; playing games with your headers. Combine that with an obviously OT &lt;br&gt; solicitation and there you are. &lt;br&gt; LOL. I do agree that Dynamic Drive is so BTDT (bookmarked that, &lt;br&gt; deleted that?) Nobody ever found anything good on *that* site.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/8051e551e2748d5d/a641e397400d9445?show_docid=a641e397400d9445</guid>
  <author>
  dmark.cins...@gmail.com
  (David Mark)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:08:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: FAQ Sections - Feedback Wanted</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/70b57217edfe9756?show_docid=70b57217edfe9756</link>
  <description>
  Sounds good to me.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/5a22cd45f259556a/70b57217edfe9756?show_docid=70b57217edfe9756</guid>
  <author>
  dmark.cins...@gmail.com
  (David Mark)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:54:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Highlight block A elements</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/ff350195648f01c2/66979f43e2748ff6?show_docid=66979f43e2748ff6</link>
  <description>
  [snip] &lt;br&gt; Why not? It is a perfectly reasonable way to get transparent borders &lt;br&gt; in IE6 (provided you wrap the rules in conditional comments.) &lt;br&gt; So, add and remove the rule (or sheet) as needed. What&#39;s the problem?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/ff350195648f01c2/66979f43e2748ff6?show_docid=66979f43e2748ff6</guid>
  <author>
  dmark.cins...@gmail.com
  (David Mark)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:43:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Overriding .textContent of BR elements</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/4e8db5f11e0f5340/7b3d6472bcd93144?show_docid=7b3d6472bcd93144</link>
  <description>
  JFYI: Firefox 3.0.3 is the currently stable version. The 1.5 branch reached &lt;br&gt; its end of life on 2007-05-30 CE with the release of Firefox 1.5.0.12, and &lt;br&gt; 2.0 will in mid of 2008-12 CE. &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox#Release_history&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; ,-&amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/core.html#Node3-textContent&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/4e8db5f11e0f5340/7b3d6472bcd93144?show_docid=7b3d6472bcd93144</guid>
  <author>
  pointede...@web.de
  (Thomas &#39;PointedEars&#39; Lahn)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:32:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Closures Explained</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/b4146150e061081f?show_docid=b4146150e061081f</link>
  <description>
  IIRC, Richard wrote the article in question. I think it is far more &lt;br&gt; helpful than this new one, even for beginners. Certainly it is the &lt;br&gt; first article on closures that I ever read and it really opened my &lt;br&gt; eyes to the possibilities (and pitfalls.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/df602506ee48b400/b4146150e061081f?show_docid=b4146150e061081f</guid>
  <author>
  dmark.cins...@gmail.com
  (David Mark)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:26:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>JS/DHTML Grid Product - Favorites?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/c6a5e413141976e6/8d85f44ec9b50f5c?show_docid=8d85f44ec9b50f5c</link>
  <description>
  For possible inclusion in an Open Source application I&#39;m writing with &lt;br&gt; PHP/MySQL server-side, I can use a decent ajax-aware grid component. &lt;br&gt; I see several good-looking ones at freshmeat, but I thought I&#39;d look &lt;br&gt; for yr experiences for some help in selecting one. &lt;br&gt; Nothing unusual in terms of requirements; common datatypes, etc.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/c6a5e413141976e6/8d85f44ec9b50f5c?show_docid=8d85f44ec9b50f5c</guid>
  <author>
  shor...@gmail.com
  (ashore)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:24:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: ready function too late?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/0fe45cc01c69e5a2/bd26b08e418e6df3?show_docid=bd26b08e418e6df3</link>
  <description>
  Those are more or less the same, despite the different JS engines &lt;br&gt; (Chrome&#39;s is supposed to much faster.) &lt;br&gt; *Not* timing. Order. &lt;br&gt; I do. So do a lot of people around here. Hence... &lt;br&gt; Lack of an incident is no real comfort, but if it is just a &lt;br&gt; presentational prototype, then it doesn&#39;t really matter. &lt;br&gt; And what do they know (other than what you tell them?)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/0fe45cc01c69e5a2/bd26b08e418e6df3?show_docid=bd26b08e418e6df3</guid>
  <author>
  dmark.cins...@gmail.com
  (David Mark)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:19:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
