Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never concede that.
> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that > the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never > concede that.
No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering fascists that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated it. What we need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big role in late 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.
> "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS" >> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious >> that the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they >> can never concede that.
> No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at > least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even > blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big > corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering > fascists that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated > it. What we need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big > role in late 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.
It would be wrong to cut off contact with the terror group just because they may have killed people "in a way that we hate." -- Bill Clinton.
"to leave now we would send a message to terrorists and other potential adversaries around the world that they can change our policies by killing our people. It would be open season on Americans." -- Bill Clinton '93 just before he pulled out of Somalia
This is Clinton's Bridge the 21st Century, a shot heard round the world declaring Open Season on ALL PEOPLE. http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/117871.gif --- LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of Value, making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of Values which one is willing to Betray.
>> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that >> the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can >> never >> concede that.
> No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at > least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even > blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big > corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering > fascists that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated it. > What we need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big role > in late 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.
Can either of you explain why *none* of the shareholders of the insurance companies - ordinary people whose pensions and incomes have been damaged by the insurers having to pay massive settlements - haven't shown up at the AGMs and demanded that the insurers recover the payouts from those you say are responsible?
Your premise is that journalists don't speak up because they'll suffer financially. Well, these people are ALREADY suffering financially, there are thousands and thousands of them, and NONE are speaking up at AGMs and demanding their money be recovered.
Remember that insurers conduct their own investigations, and aren't bound by the same rules government agencies are.
If you can't convincingly explain why this is the case, your "intimidation of media" argument is meaningless, in fact it's disproved.
In article <Xns9ADE6A770BFriemann1850yahoo...@216.168.3.70>, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that >the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never >concede that.
Huh?
"The Media" was reporting, all afternoon, that WTC7 was on fire and about to collapse. I saw this TV report at about 4:30 PM on 9/11. WTC7 collapsed at 5:30. This matwerial is in the archives.
The archives of all the NYC media outlets report, in detail, what happened and NYC folks that were eyewitnesses to WTC read the news coverage and absolutely NOBODY said at the time, or since that any specific report didn't jive with what they saw.
I saw parts of WTC on 9/11 and the media reported what I saw correctly. I know NYC firemen that were at WTC on 9/11. They say the media reported what they saw corrrectly.
The "Media" reported the full text transcripts of what the firemen reported. Here it is.
>> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that >> the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never >> concede that.
>No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at
It's all in the vidoe archives of teh TV NYC TV stations. Fo instance, MSNBC reported well becore WTC7 fell that it was due to collapse due to fire.
...images, captured largely by amateurs, are moments from more than 500 hours of videos and films, the largest collection of raw visual data from what historians say is the best-documented catastrophe in history. About 1,700 clips from the collection have attracted more than a million hits in the three months since they were put on Google Video.
These books describe what was reported on 9/11,
Book: _Nine Months at Ground Zero_ By Stout, Vitchers, & Gray
Book: _A nation challenged : a visual history of 9/11 and its aftermath_ By Callaway
Book: _Watching The world change; The Stories behind the images of 9/11 By David Friend
Book: _102 Minutes_ by Dwyer & Flynn p.67. Steel spans buckled in 1975 fire. (probably from NIST Interim Report May 2003, P.20)
-- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
>>> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that >>> the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can >>> never >>> concede that.
>> No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at >> least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even >> blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big >> corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering >> fascists that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated it. >> What we need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big role >> in late 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.
>Can either of you explain why *none* of the shareholders of the insurance >companies - ordinary people whose pensions and incomes have been damaged by
If the "Truth Movement" really had evidence of fraud for WTC7, all they have to do is find the names of Silverstein's insurance companies (on the public record) and buy one share of stock on each and show up at the annual stockholders meeting and announce that here was evidence that a billion bucks should be paid to the stockholders instead of Silverstein.
Oh. I forgot. Insurance and how stock and what stockholders works is one more thing the children in the "Truth Movement" are ignorant of.
-- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
In article <Xns9ADE6A770BFriemann1850yahoo...@216.168.3.70>, xeton2001 @yahoo.com says...
> Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that > the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never > concede that.
BWHAHAHAHAHA! You need another change of medication. I think the docs have just about run out of things to try.
> > Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that > > the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never > > concede that.
> No doubt there are some individual reporters and writers that know or at > least suspect the truth - but they face the loss of their jobs and even > blacklisting should they say anything. The media, as with all big > corpserations, have fallen under the control of the mass-murdering fascists > that deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, if not perpetrated it. What we > need is an "undergound" free press. Such media played a big role in late > 1960s politics and the ending of the Vietnam war.
WOW, it's a kookoff! One kook trying to become king of the kooktards!
On Jul 17, 7:56 pm, ady...@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> In article <Xns9ADE6A770BFriemann1850yahoo...@216.168.3.70>, > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Once you start talking about 911, esp Building 7, it becomes obvious that > >the media was in on the cover-up right from the start. And they can never > >concede that.
> Huh?
> "The Media" was reporting, all afternoon, that WTC7 was on fire and > about to collapse. I saw this TV report at about 4:30 PM on 9/11. > WTC7 collapsed at 5:30. This matwerial is in the archives.
That's their point. The media was in on it and lying about the building's condition so when the invisable, silent explosives brought the building down, they could claim it was in the process of happening for hours.
